The narrative inquiry approach described by Luton (2010) is the most applicable strategy for my proposed study which seeks to collect information regarding the negatives of the administration process in education. Due to the fact that the key information collection method to be employed is through interviews, the narrative method will help to obtain information in a form of connectedness that is characteristic of the interview process. The approach will enhance the validity of the study besides maintaining the connection between the researcher and the participants by enabling the researcher to collect data that makes sense.
In order to give clear conclusions in the study, it will be necessary to understand the implicit perceptions of the participants in the U.S Department of Education. This will be achieved through collection of participant stories on how bureaucracies in the administration results into inconveniences and problems. Acquiring contextual meaning during information collection will be made more effective through contrasting participant ideas with their opposites. It will also be necessary to discover the missing parts of narration (Feldman et al., 2004).
While carrying out the study, ante-narrative approaches can help to yield an in-depth understanding of disadvantages in the organizational setting. Since the experiences of each of the participants constitutes the most effective method of illustrating personal experiences. Analysis of participant stories can help to achieve greater understanding the facilitation of idea competence and observation of the inconveniences caused by bureaucratic administration structures.
The researcher’s decision making should be based on normative choices instead of reacting to encountered and prevalent laws. The capacity for choice and judgment is based on environmental factors. Making choices based on these factors help in the preservation of effectiveness and validity of the study. The consideration of participants’ stories recognizes the value that each participant contributes to the study.
Feldman, K., Skoldberg, K., Brown, R. and Honer, D. (2004). Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 147-170.
Luton, L. (2010). Qualitative Research Approaches for Public Administration. M.E. Sharpe, New York, USA.
The public administration reflective paper on Narrative Inquiry summarized above was written by one of our top professional writers. If you need help in writing a reflective paper on a topic of your choice feel free to contact us. We will assign the most qualified writer to handle your paper so as to ensure you get a well written paper.