Sample Political Science Paper on Texas Government

A Texas governor is different from the state mayor in unique ways. For instance, the governor can veto a bill from a state legislative body whereas a mayor cannot. Mayors have a restricted jurisdiction when it comes to the economic development of a state. However, in a strong-mayor city, the mayor addresses social and political development in the entire country. There are different strategies that leaders use for building political agendas. For instance, political leaders garner support by donating vast financial resources in charity events. The governor has more power as he represents the people’s choice – implying he commands a huge audience – than mayors.

Counties are essential for devolving public resources to ordinary people in public. Counties create laws through its legislative chamber. Counties administer those laws within their area of federal jurisdiction. Counties are responsible for maintaining and repairing village roads leading to remote towns. Counties provide scholarship opportunities to local students in the form of bursaries. Counties are mandated to promote security by mounting and maintaining streetlights.

Texas has different sources of revenues including; court fines, taxes, penalties, licensing fees and federal budget allocation. Taxes collected are regressive as they promote corruption activities in different ways. Funding state services have provided a framework for corruption as organizers spend too much money without value in services. This has marred the Texas political culture. Income tax creates an ethical framework which taxes people concerning their income levels. Ordinary would people feel valued just like the wealthy class in Texas.

The purpose of redistricting is to promote the fair allocation of resources among all people in Texas. Guidelines for redistricting vary in scope, but they are analogous towards improving resource allocation. The main advantage of legislating the process of redistricting entails enhancing accountability and transparency in public processes. Stakeholders feel inclusive in a decision-making process that involves them directly. The redistricting process should have all its members undertaken a vetting procedure to promote goodwill. Political conflicts arising from redistricting might escalate to an uncontrollable level.