Homework Question on Nietzsche’s Criticism of the Ascetic Ideal
- Explain and Examine Nietzsche’s CRITICISM of the ascetic ideal and COMPARE it with how the Ubermensch lives.
- Explain whether his analysis is correct and HOW IT WOULD APPLY TO OUR WORLD TODAY.
- Primary objection is with ascetic ideals is they must deny the value of this life.
- Nietzsche’s – his fundamental drive is to will power, the desire to exercise our will at all times. EVERYTHING HAS TO BE CITED. Use the book Genealogy of Morals but don’t cite the page but the section.
Homework Answer on Nietzsche’s Criticism of the Ascetic Ideal
Many scholars have developed philosophies that have an immense impact on the political, socio-cultural, religious, and economic spheres. They pass on intellectual thinking that aid human beings in shaping their characterization and mode of life. Friedrich Nietzsche a 19th century philosopher has made significant contribution and he had a special interest in morality, religion, and social criticism among others. Nietzsche talks of ascetic ideal as the act of complete withdrawal from worldly life and dedicating oneself to chastity and humility.
In his book, On the Genealogy of Morality, he tries to highlight an analytical critique of moral values and tracing the background of some concepts such as guilt and responsibility. Similarly, Nietzsche talks of Ubermensch lives which he describes as an overboard or beyond normal human life. It is considered one of his most intellectual and significant concept in his literal works. Therefore, this paper aims at viewing and highlighting Nietzsche’s criticism of the ascetic ideal and giving a comparison to ubermensch lives.
This paper’s thesis idea concerns the idea that the ascetic ideal – the act of complete withdrawal from worldly life and dedicating oneself to chastity and humility – is impractical in the context of humans’ life, given the reality that they are worldly creatures with desires that are worldly. This study relies on Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality, to develop its argument and evaluate the concepts involved.