Sample History Paper On The Crane Clan System

Homework Question on The Crane Clan System

  1. Write about your experience learning about the Clan System. While integrating your understanding of a number of the concepts that you have learned this term.
  2. Make sure to demonstrate that you have an understanding of the Clan System tenets and philosophy. Can such a governance system be restored, developed and survive in the modern day?
  3. How did you feel participating in such a vigorous simulation of clan governance?
  4. Talk about my experience in the crane clan and what is my role in the clan. Please include it in the paper.
  • Remember, we always want to know your thoughts and understanding. Consider all of the topics covered in this course. Share your voice with us.

Homework Answer on The Crane Clan System

Although the contemporary society does not emphasize much about clans and chiefdoms, every individual belong to a particular clan. A clan is a faction whose members share a common ancestor. For most traditional cultures, the Clan System involves a customary structure that presides over a group of people. Each clan has its roles, as well as purposes, that concern the well being of the entire community.

For instance, my clan, the Crane Clan, is allocated the role of leaders and chiefs, to ensure that all activities in the tribe happen according to the plans. This study will cover on the Crane Clan, which part of the Anishinaabe Clan System, with an aim of understanding the clan system doctrine and philosophy.

Homework Help

The Anishinabee Clan System

For thousands of years, Anishinaabe were some of the indigenous groups from North America, who lived in the forests that were located in the northwestern Ontario (Willow, 2012). Some Natives recalled that the Anishinaabe settled in northern Minnesota almost at the same time as the first white men. When European settlers arrived in North America, the Anishinaabe were compelled to interact with them, and were coerced to sign treaty that recognized the sovereignty of the Europeans (Bohaker, 2010).