The current Internet
It is obvious that it took the effort of several important people to come up with the internet every individual is presently enjoying. Some of these people included the pioneers and the technicians who were landing a submarine cable on a beach at Portugal. For instance, In Silical Valley, Blum met the person who convinced telecommunication firms to extend into the Palo Alto Internet Exchange (PAIE). He managed to transform the industry by lying that competitors had already done the same. This implies that it was not easy to enhance what was already than. And it’s the same reason why the guy had to pose a lie. To achieve good connectivity, there had to be a very intelligent, and hard working person to achieve it. From the text we read that, at a forum in Texas, Blum had a chance of meeting Google’s Sylvie LaPerriere. Her duty was mainly to make sure that other companies were able to link with Google. Her understandable readiness to connect without any charges made her a “Peering slut” The article by Blum mainly features internet connectivity (Blum, 2012).
During the initial time of introducing the internet there were different data centers that were managed by the world’s internet giants. This is featured where the writer gets a chance to visit some of them. It is clear that, achieving internet privacy was not simple during the early years of internet inventory. Google did so by refraining from taking visitors around their station. The confidentiality of the search engine, which even stretched to interfering with the image of its data hub from Google Diagrams, was dissimilar from its public support for transparency. On the other hand, Facebook was pleased to show Bum around its data center in the neighboring. Does this imply that Google had much respect for the privacy of its clients’ details? The author leaves readers thinking about issues that would not have crossed their minds before. He leaves the readers more conversant with innovation that most of them take for granted. What we have today is as a result of joint efforts. The article gives a description of how immense internet connectivity joined forces duration of the boom in the 1990s. For instance, the collaboration of the Metropolitan Area Exchange (MAE) East, MAE West, and the PALE. The article gives a good illustration of their development (Blum, 2012).
Social relationships and trust are the key factors for protecting the stability of the internet. The Article by Mathew and Cheshire mainly talks about the internet governance. Internet trust and transparency it not an easy thing to achieve. It takes the use of technology and its related technological practices to enhance trust transitively. In the current world, the internet can be defined by tussles among various interests. The technology of the internet should be fabricated to enable these tussles to play as they wish. This should happen with a clear attempt of avoiding programming political preferences into technological form. The establishments of the internet should be designed in a way that it allows for wrangles between various local applications of the internet. This allows them to interoperate and coexist. This kind of a system has to depend on a hybrid form of authority (Mathew & Cheshire, 2010). The authors are mainly arguing about a joint focus on technological designs with a consciousness of the social forms and the daily practice in network governance.
The two readings are mainly focused on exposing the inner workings of the internet. The physical structure of the internet has numerous centers. If individuals are to comprehend how things fit together, they should start by eliminating themselves from the center of the universe. Do you ever at one point try to imagine what happens for a web page to manifest as digital text and images on the computer screen? How does it happen practically? This is the same reasons the two articles are trying to uncover what many individuals are unaware of.
Blum, A. (2012, May). Tubes: A Journey to the Center of the Internet. New York: Ecco.
Mathew, A., & Cheshire, C. (2010). The new cartographers: Trust and social order within the Internet infrastructure. Retrieved from https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=547022083087090076118073001104103024049000065041003092069027094091027069087080125091098126125118116127113012075013014125123029123091003060028025064013066071028031104001060057013012085112089113030088123003067005085087088095112011116127030027085077116069&EXT=pdf