Artificial Intelligence in the Court of Law
Executive summary
Business ethics will be increasingly affected by the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the courtroom. AI is being used to analyze evidence, predict the outcomes of cases, and even judge cases. This raises ethical questions such as: are AI systems making fair and unbiased decisions? Can AI be used to reduce inherent biases in court systems? Additionally, AI can be used to identify potential conflicts of interest and uncover potential unethical activities of lawyers, judges, and court administrators. The ethical concerns surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the courtroom include a lack of transparency, neutrality, and embedded or inserted bias. AI decisions are often not intelligible to humans, making it difficult to assess whether the decision was accurate or biased. Furthermore, AI-based decisions can be subject to inaccuracies and discriminatory outcomes, which could lead to wrongful convictions. Finally, AI systems can also be subject to embedded or inserted bias, which could lead to decisions that are biased against certain groups or individuals. These ethical concerns must be addressed to ensure fairness and accuracy in the courtroom.
According to Lütge, Christoph, and Matthias (2021), business ethics is the application of ethical principles to the business context. AI is increasingly being used in the courtroom to help with decision-making. The use of AI in the courtroom raises ethical questions. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the courtroom is becoming increasingly prominent. AI has the potential to revolutionize the legal field by offering innovative solutions to longstanding issues such as cost, accuracy, and efficiency. AI is being used to automate tasks, streamline legal processes, and help lawyers and judges make better decisions. AI technology can be used to identify patterns in data, analyze legal documents, and search for similar cases. AI systems can be used to expedite the tedious task of searching court records and archives. AI systems can also be used in legal proceedings to provide impartial advice to judges, attorneys, and other legal practitioners.
AI is increasingly being used to automate routine tasks such as document preparation and review. Automation of these tasks can significantly reduce the time and cost associated with legal proceedings. AI technology can also be used to detect bias in legal decision-making. AI algorithms can analyze court decisions and identify patterns of unfairness and bias (Walters, Robert, and Marko, 2021). AI can be used to reduce bias by providing neutral and objective advice to judges. AI technology can also be used to improve the accuracy of legal decisions (39-69). AI systems can be used to identify patterns in data that may indicate a favorable outcome for a particular case. AI can also be used to detect inconsistencies in legal documents and identify inconsistencies in witness statements. AI can also be used to accurately predict the outcome of a case. AI technology is also being used to improve the efficiency of court proceedings (50). AI systems can be used to streamline the scheduling of court proceedings and the filing of legal documents. AI technology can also be used to automate the process of collecting evidence and preparing legal documents.
Ethical Issues
One of the primary ethical issues with the use of AI in the court of law is the potential for bias. AI systems rely on data to create algorithms that are used to make decisions. If the data used to create the algorithms is biased, then the decisions made by the AI system will be biased as well. This could result in unfair decisions being made in court (Lütge, Christoph, and Matthias, 2021). It is also important to consider the potential for privacy violations when using AI in a court of law. If AI systems are used to make decisions, the data used to make those decisions must be protected and kept confidential. Another ethical concern related to the use of AI in the courtroom is the potential for a lack of transparency.
AI systems can be difficult to understand, and it can be difficult to explain how decisions were made. This could lead to a lack of trust in the decisions being made by the AI system. Courts need to be transparent about the decision-making process and be able to explain why a decision was reached. Finally, another ethical issue related to the use of AI in the courtroom is the potential for AI systems to replace judges and lawyers (Lütge, Christoph, and Matthias, 2021). AI systems are increasingly being used to make decisions in the court of law, which could potentially lead to the displacement of lawyers and judges. This could lead to a lack of accountability and a lack of job opportunities for lawyers and judges.
Question 1; Business Ethic in the Use of AI in the Court of Law.
AI is not neutral.
A major concern related to artificial intelligence (AI) in the court of law is that AI systems are prone to inaccuracies, discriminatory outcomes, and embedded or inserted bias, which can lead to unfair judgments. This is especially concerning because AI is increasingly being used to make legal decisions. The potential for AI-based decisions to be inaccurate is a major ethical concern (Alarie et al, 2018). AI systems are often built on data sets with inherent biases, and when used in a court of law, these biases can lead to decisions that are not just. Moreover, AI-based decisions can be affected by inaccurate data or data that does not accurately represent the full picture of a case (106-124). This can lead to decisions that are not based on the facts of the case and may not reflect the actual legal implications of the case.
Another ethical concern related to AI in the courtroom is the potential for discriminatory outcomes. AI systems can be biased against certain groups of people, and this can lead to unfair decisions and outcomes in court. This is especially concerning because AI-based decisions are often irreversible and can have long-term consequences for those affected by them. Moreover, AI systems can be biased against certain types of cases, leading to a potential lack of justice for those involved.
An ethical concern related to AI in the courtroom is the potential for embedded or inserted bias. AI systems can be designed to favor certain outcomes or decisions, and this can lead to biased judgments in a court of law. This can lead to decisions that are not based on the facts or the law and can lead to unfair outcomes for those involved (Alarie et al, 2018). Moreover, this type of bias can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency, as AI-based decisions can be difficult to challenge or appeal. These ethical concerns related to AI in the courtroom are extremely concerning and should be taken seriously. AI-based decisions can have serious consequences, and it is important to ensure that these decisions are accurate and unbiased.
To ensure fairness and justice, AI systems must be designed with transparency and accountability in mind. Additionally, AI systems should be designed to be transparent and auditable, so that any potential biases or inaccuracies can be identified and addressed. Finally, it is important to ensure that AI-based decisions are reversible so that any potential errors or biases can be corrected. In short, the ethical concerns related to AI in the court of law are real and must be addressed (Alarie et al, 2018). AI systems must be designed with transparency and accountability in mind and be able to be audited and reversed to ensure fairness and justice. By taking these steps, we can ensure that AI-based decisions are accurate and unbiased and that those affected by them are given the justice and fairness they deserve.
Lack of transparency in AI tools
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the courtroom is a growing trend and one that has raised numerous ethical questions about its potential implications. Another major source of concern in legal circles about AI is the lack of transparency in AI tools. This lack of transparency is concerning because AI decisions are often not intelligible to humans, meaning that there is often no way to understand why an AI system came to a particular conclusion or why it might have made a certain decision following a certain set of criteria (de Diego and Alberto, 2020). This lack of transparency is particularly concerning when it comes to AI systems that are used to make decisions that could have far-reaching implications, such as sentencing or bail decisions. In these cases, the decision-making process must be both reliable and explainable. Reliability means that the decision-making process should be able to repeat the same result regardless of the data or circumstances. Explainability means that the decisions should be explained in a manner that is understandable by humans.
The lack of transparency of AI tools can also lead to issues related to bias and fairness. If an AI system bases its decisions on criteria that are not fully understood, it is more likely to make decisions that are unfair or biased against certain groups of people. This is especially concerning when the AI system is making decisions about people’s lives, such as sentencing or bail decisions, as these decisions can have a significant impact on individuals (de Diego and Alberto, 2020). In addition, the lack of transparency of AI tools can create a lack of accountability, as it is difficult to pinpoint exactly who is responsible for a particular decision. This can lead to a lack of trust in the AI system and a lack of confidence in the decisions that it is making. As such, AI systems need to be transparent and accountable so that individuals can trust that their decisions are based on reliable and explainable criteria.
The lack of transparency of AI tools is a significant concern when it comes to their use in a court of law. It is important that the decision-making processes of AI systems be both reliable and explainable, and that they be free from bias and unfairness. It is also important that AI systems be transparent and accountable so that individuals can trust that the decisions are being made in their best interests. Without this transparency and accountability, the AI systems used in courts of law may not be able to provide justice for all.
Question 2; Normative Theory.
The normative theory I most agree with when considering the use of artificial intelligence in the courtroom is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory that seeks to maximize the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people in a given situation. Utilitarianism argues that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of net benefit for the greatest number of people affected by the action (Longoni, Chiara, and Luca, 2022). In terms of the lack of transparency of AI tools, utilitarianism would suggest that the benefits of using AI should outweigh the potential harms of using it in a court of law. This means that AI must be used in such a way that it produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. This could include ensuring the accuracy of the AI by having a system of checks and balances in place to assess and review its decisions.
Furthermore, it would be necessary to ensure that AI is not used in a discriminatory or biased manner, as this could lead to an unequal distribution of benefits and harms. When it comes to the issue of AI not being neutral, utilitarianism would suggest that the technology should only be used if it produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people (Longoni, Chiara, and Luca, 2022). This means that AI should not be used in a discriminatory or biased manner and should be used responsibly and ethically. As the use of AI in a court of law can have a significant impact on people’s lives, it must be used in a way that is not only fair but also produces the best outcome for the greatest number of people.
Overall, utilitarianism would suggest that the use of AI in the courtroom should be carefully thought out and implemented responsibly. AI should be used in a way that produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people and should not be used in a way that is discriminatory or biased. Furthermore, AI should be used in a transparent manner that produces the best outcome for all parties involved (Longoni, Chiara, and Luca, 2022). Ultimately, utilitarianism is an ethical theory that seeks to maximize the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. In the case of AI in the court of law, utilitarianism would suggest that the use of AI should be carefully thought out and implemented responsibly to produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. AI should not be used in a way that is discriminatory or biased, and it should be used transparently and responsibly.
Conclusion
The increasing presence of artificial intelligence (AI) in all areas of our lives has raised important questions about business ethics and its application in the legal system. AI is increasingly being used in the courtroom, and this has raised concerns about the lack of transparency of AI tools, the potential for inaccuracies and discriminatory outcomes, and the potential for embedded or inserted bias. Most AI algorithms today are built on large datasets and use machine learning to develop their decision-making capabilities. However, this means that the decisions AI systems make are often not intelligible to humans, and the underlying models are often difficult to explain and interpret. This lack of transparency can make it difficult for individuals to understand why a particular decision was made and for legal professionals to examine the accuracy of the AI’s decision-making. Also, AI algorithms are not neutral and can be subject to inaccuracies, discriminatory outcomes, and embedded or inserted bias. AI algorithms can inherit the biases of the data they are built on, leading to decisions that are skewed in favor of certain groups or against others.
AI can also be manipulated to introduce bias into decision-making, meaning that decisions are not based on facts or data but on what the manipulator wants the AI to do. This can have serious consequences for decision-making in a court of law. Finally, the use of AI in the courtroom can lead to a lack of accountability for decisions. AI systems can make decisions that humans may not be able to understand or explain, and this can make it difficult for individuals to challenge the outcomes or seek redress. Additionally, it can lead to decisions being made without sufficient human oversight, leading to potential abuses of power. AI is becoming increasingly integrated into the legal system, and this raises important questions about its impact on business ethics. Transparency, accuracy, neutrality, and accountability are all important considerations when using AI in a court of law, and these concerns must be addressed if AI is to be used ethically and responsibly.
Bibliography
Lütge, Christoph, and Matthias Uhl. “An Economically Informed Approach to Business Ethics.” Business Ethics, 2021, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864776.003.0001
Walters, Robert, and Marko Novak. “Artificial Intelligence and Law.” In Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection & the Law, pp. 39-69. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-16-1665-5
Alarie, Benjamin, Anthony Niblett, and Albert H. Yoon. “How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law.” University of Toronto Law Journal 68, no. supplement 1 (2018): 106-124. https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/utlj.2017-0052
Sourdin, Tania. “Judge v Robot?: Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making.” University of New South Wales Law Journal, The 41, no. 4 (2018): 1114-1133. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.040979608613368
Schaefer, Taylor B. “The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in the Law.” Gonz. L. Rev. 55 (2019): 221. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/gonlr55&div=11&id=&page=
Carrillo, Margarita Robles. “Artificial intelligence: From ethics to law.” Telecommunications Policy 44, no. 6 (2020): 101937. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030859612030029X
de Diego Carreras, Alberto. “The Moral (Un) Intelligence Problem of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice: A Comparative Analysis under Different Theories of Punishment.” UCLA JL & Tech. 25 (2020): i. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ujlt25&div=3&id=&page=
Longoni, Chiara, and Luca Cian. “Artificial intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: The “word-of-machine” effect.” Journal of Marketing 86, no. 1 (2022): 91-108. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022242920957347?journalCode=jmxa