Research Sample Paper on Bias in Drug Research

Bias in Drug Research

The first stage in conducting inquiry is the identification and maturation of the topic of interest. Researchers are required to identify a problem or topic that they are interested in finding out more about. The researchers then pose the issue as a question that necessitates answering. After raising the question, there is a need to identify the central concepts and keywords from the research question. The concepts are then tested by looking them up in online databases and other appropriate background sources in order to assess the appropriateness of the topic. If there is too much information on the subject and an extensive variety of sources, the researcher needs to narrow the topic. On the other hand, finding too little information on the subject necessitates the researcher to broaden the topic.

In recent years, doctors and other professionals have widely critiqued the available research on drugs. This is due to the increased tendency of drug companies to interfere in and influence research. More than half of the financefor research on drugs is derived from the drug industry, which presents an opportunity for influence in their high-risk quest for profits. The drug companies do so by obscure g the dangerous side effects of such drugs. When companies are funding research, they can manipulate research to make their products look better. Most of them select academics who have previously expressed a liking to the test drug. These academics also have a financial link with the company either as company employees or consultants, which increases their risk to proffer a favorable report of the drug by 3.6 times.

The shift in conducting trials from nonprofit organizations to contract research organizations also aids in increasing bias as these companies compete in running tests. Drug companies also hide data that reflects negatively on their drugs from peer reviewers of their research findings. Even with independent researchers, the drug companies hide information that would be vital to conducting research. In some situations, the researchers themselves for fear of financial repercussions against them opt to keep some findings to themselves when the risk to the drugs’ reputation from publishing such results is way too high. Drug companies also obscure the hypothesis and reasons for conducting some trials, making it harder for investigators to spot the problem.

Another way that drug companies influence research is by tweaking some aspects of research to diminish the probability of the research showing adverse effects. They may use test patients who are less prone to the side effects of the test drug, making it harder to spot the problem. Moreover, most of them avail patient results that are too little to be considered statistically significant. By so doing, drug companies have circumvented the two major assumptions people have of drug companies in research; the responsibility to share everything about the drug; and their commitment to finding the truth and helping patients.

As a consumer, I opine that most drug companies are out to help patients. However, it would be unwise to play ignorant to the fact that these corporations also have a profit motive. As such, they will obscure some details that would lead to them running losses from sales if such information were made public. There is veritable evidence to prove that drug companies do engage in unethical research practices. As much as most drug corporations are legit, at times they do influence industry research negatively.