Withdrawal of treatment is of great concern to the nursing practice, as it has been a source of tension between the doctors and nurses involved in the process as well as the patient’s family members. The reasons given for withdrawal treatment during critical care to dying patients are an issue that raises ethical and moral concerns across the world. The circumstances have been characterized by differing demands made on the health care practitioners as they endeavor with their duties of providing care to the dying patients by the family members (Nathaniel & Andrews, 2010).
Grounded theory is a powerful tool that is suited for health care empirical circumstances, especially in research methods, as it provides relevant predictions, justifications, inferences, and applications due to their real world inclination. Grounded theory can help health care practitioners to comprehend that certain patterns would eventually appear; certain persons will always respond in a particular manner and easily predict the outcomes of certain actions (Nathaniel & Andrews, 2010). Grounded theory was chosen for the case of dying patients because when practitioners are able to comprehend the patterns that have an effect on the patients, they would be in a position to alter or modify the harmful patterns in order to advance quality healthcare.
The practitioners’ awareness of dying would encourage them to be sensitive towards predictable processes that are related to end of life care, apply the grounded theory, and alter their actions to make things better. Through the comprehension of the perspectives of awareness and the impact of their words as well as their actions towards the dying patients, the practitioners would be better placed to attend to both the patients and their families with honesty at the time of death (Nathaniel & Andrews, 2010).
Nathaniel, A. K., & Andrews, T. (2010). The modifiability of grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 9 (4), 65-77.