Homework Writing Help on Gay marriage

Gay marriage


In his speech in 2004, the former president of the United States of America addressed the nation on matters that he considered to be of national importance- the marriage debate (Burn 7). The society, scholars, politicians and,citizens have a duty to declare their position on the gay marriage debate. With much debate on the topic, president bush at the time indicated that the union of man and woman is the most honored, encouraged and upheld principle in a societal and family setting. The president at the same time, called on the society to protect the traditional setting and definition of marriage and restrict the act to only heterosexual parties.  The supporters of gay marriage argued that marriage is a union between two people and therefore, homosexuals and lesbians should be allowed to have their way. They also argued that if marriage was made for procreation purposes, then the barren and the unwilling to conceive should not marry. They argued that it is constitutional for individual’s right to decide, to be respected. Marriage has changed over time, and the contemporary families have lost meaning of marriage. Some people think that marriage is a contractual thing, while others cohabite thus, abusing the original meaning of marriage. Actually, the supporters of gay marriage argues that since some states had passed laws legalizing the marriage, why then should others read from different scripts. The side opposing gay marriage on the other hand argued that from the order of right reason, and moral view, gay marriage is bad. In this, marriage entails the union of heterosexuals, and allowing the gays to adopt, or bring up children would be a disservice to these children as they would have the void of one parent. This is therefore a social issue that should be studied as it relates to the future generation. If we direct the children in the wrong path, then, we will be held to blame by the future generations for failing to give proper direction regarding the case. This being the case, my position is to support the legalization of gay marriage using the utilitarianism and deontological approaches.

Applying the Utilitarian Approach to Address Gay Marriage

Using the utilitarian approach, it is important and imperative to indicate that marriage exists for the sake of maximizing the overall utility, through the promotion of responsible happiness, enhancing a long term romantic relationship, as well as culminating a situation of family and social stability (Burns 982). It therefore follows that marriage should be preserved as a legal institution. But following the utilitarianism theory, gay marriage would be beneficial to the gay persons and heterosexuals as it maximizes their total utility.  This being the case, under the moral reasoning, there exists no difference between a heterosexual marriages and gays since they all enjoy similar things that are derived in a marriage. In this, their values are the same, are responsible to their partners, the community and the neighborhoods. Indeed, they are good citizens only that they are deemed to have taken a different path and notion on marriage.

Under utilitarian perspective, the three basic features that depicts the total utility includes consequentialism, welfarism, as well as the sum ranking. Logically, it is impossible to determine whether gay marriage is god or bad, or people considers it and as a result of social construction. When a woman decides to have an abortion, she ensures that there are no offspring’s in that heterosexual relationship. On the other hand, an infertile woman may end up getting divorced. What utility will such scenarios bring? It would be better and logical if gay marriage was allowed since it would reducethe costs involved to carry out the needed operations in abortion, or in divorce cases. Passing the gay marriage act would be beneficial to the future generation as it will enable them enjoy the benefits currently enjoyed by the heterosexuals. These includes social insurance, joint ownership, and tax filing among other benefits.  It is therefore sentimental that by legalizing gay marriage will help the future generationsbe stable in their relationship, as well as a stable psychosocial existence between them.

Using Deontology to Address Gay Marriage

The deontological approach entails using morals to derive a common good. Under this approach, two assumptions are utilized, that include the moral authority of the government and the right to equality. The right to marry gives rise to the question as how that right ought to be defined. The question that does arise is whether the right to marry entails the person of heterosexual nature or includes the same sex marriages. To respond to such claim, if a person is not interested to another of the opposite sex, there is no loss in marrying. If there is an assumption that the right to marriage is as a consequent of procreation, then this does not provide a strong base for a person right to marry. Marriage is therefore an individual right which aims at pursuing harmony and happiness. This being the case, it is only morally right to indicate that gay marriage should not be denied tothe same sex couples.

Talking of equal laws, the government has the moral obligation to protect the interest of various groups. Therefore, it renders null and void the views of those opposing of gay marriage, since, the equal protection should be accorded for individuals to achieve happiness. Using the Kantian moral theory, he uses the term categorical imperative to explain the morality of an action (Sullivan 63). Kant’s views indicates that the unnaturalness of the gay marriage does not lead to immorality, and therefore, one cannot restrict marriage to heterosexuals or for procreation purposes. If marriage therefore is only opted out when the partnerscannot treat each other equally, why then should gay marriage be legalized. The gay persons commit to each other, and makes each other happy. According to the deontological view, an action is considered morally right if it leadsto positive motives

Theory that Best Explains Opposition for Gay Marriage

Among the two theories, the utilitarian theory best explains how the future generations can be helped by legalizing the gay marriage. In this, the theory explains how total good can be derived out of its legalization. All in all, keeping in mind that there exists an opposition to gay marriage, the theory that try to address individual utilities should be well supported in this case. This means that under the utilitarianism, the total happiness that the disadvantaged same sex marriage partners that have been lacking would be uplifted. Though Kant moral theory talks well of the categorical imperative, it is not as commanding as the utility theory (Rawls 26). To help address the question of gay marriage and the opposing views available, it would only be logical if a tough critical utilitarian approach was employed.

Works Cited

Burns, Kate. Gay and lesbian families. GreenhavenPr, 2005.

Rawls, John. “KANTIAN CONSTRUCTIVISM IN MORAL THEORY.” Političkamisao 41.3 (2005): 3-48.

Sullivan, Roger J. Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory. Cambridge u.a: Cambridge Univ. Pr, 1989. Print.