Health Care Essay Paper on Stakeholders Compare and Contrast Essay

Stakeholders Compare and Contrast Essay

Introduction

In every circumstance, achieving the organization’s objectives require general participation of each stakeholder could either be; a client, an employee, shareholders, investors, government or any other physical authority (Birk, 2010, p. 3). Therefore, as much as clients look forward to improved healthcare services, healthcare organizations and service providers aim at using every identified opportunity to expand in their services and improve profit levels. This study focuses on the conflicting operational ideologies as envisioned by healthcare providers and other categories of stakeholders.

The services offered in Healthcare Units link to the active roles played by organization leaders, which in most cases remain distinct to the particular visions and performance regulations. At higher levels of service delivery, we observe significant deviations in performance, which are because of competing visions of health care administration among stakeholders (Birk, 2010, p. 3). However, amidst the differences, some similarities exist and just as mentioned, such similarities are core and generalize the performance levels within various healthcare organizations.

Comparison of the competing vision

Every healthcare organization operates with an aim of making the healthcare services accessible and affordable. Such vision is encrypted under the access reform and the long run goal is to boost healthcare coverage while reducing instances chronic attacks. As projected by healthcare leaders, improved coverage and reduced operational costs will increase the response clients give by constantly seeking medical assistance (Birk, 2010, p. 5). The step to expand access to medical services calls for enhanced changes within the health sector such giving health insurance cover to patients, incorporating technologies within the health care industries and ensuring constant recruitments and job updates to match the changing healthcare demands.

Other than improving access to clients, healthcare managers aim at ensuring that the services obtained by their clients are quality, efficient and sufficient. With the need to improve the level of services offered, the human resource team must provide an equal basis employment. The recruitment process must be based on professionalism and creativity. In various occasions, healthcare organizations compete in their recruitment processes and opt to retain job ethics while giving opportunity for advance medical care (Birk, 2010, p. 5).

On the same note, health care performances is governed by the need to coordinate health care service and better integrate those programs that will improve healthcare services alongside improving earnings from such services. As outlined in US health legislations, health managers must operate within the bounds of health programs that are capable of improving standards of performance (Edwards, 2010, p. 4). The ideas contained within such legislations give priority to personal ideas and extensively investing in innovative activities in a way that balances the federal taxes and government health incentives. By making proper investments in innovative activities within the health sectors, health managers in general tend to upgrade their medical brands. So far, this operation strategy offers foundation towards improving the image of the organization and ensuring that specific healthcare centers retain high market coverage.

In general, the management processes in healthcare organizations follow unanimous ethics. Such ethics can only be described under the projected plans but still follow specifications of the US healthcare regulations. Even though the US political system has its stand on health issues, healthcare mangers understand best areas to be explored in order to create an environment that will allow important changes within the health sector. Other than the mentioned factors, every hospital today tend to improve its performance by providing highly integrated systems of delivery and embarking on advanced keeping of medical records through electronic means. Such advancements in every hospital and health care unit are complete demonstrations of transition as mandated by various health providers.  

Differences of the competing vision

As stated earlier, every healthcare provider in USA today is governed by the vision to provide accessible and affordable healthcare services to the entire US population irrespective of social class, race or gender. Such a vision obtains much support from the federal government since it is line with most of the health reforms. However, the means to ensure complete delivery of the health care services differ and depend on the strategies developed by every organization. Such strategies exhibit managerial objectives, which in this case can be termed as very distinct. Some of the differences retail around the organizations’ core values, performance planning, means of delivering services and corporate governance.

As much as most healthcare units are driven by the urge to provide complete and rotations healthcare service to the entire population of America, some healthcare organizations offer such services voluntarily and projects on better health status of citizens (Edwards, 2010, p. 4). However, majority of such health providers find health issues a better opportunity for investment with the main aim of making capital gains. For example, in the case of charitable organizations, the core value is to reach as many people as possible and provide basic training on how well an individual can live without facing serious health challenges. On the contrary, health organizations that base their operations on profit identify a specific health challenge within the community and uses such as an opportunity to make profits (Edwards, 2010, p. 4). This performance aspect seems contrary to the US health formulations that aim at ensuring healthcare accessibility and control over supply of medical equipment throughout the delivery process. Precisely, whereas some health providers are driven by profit gains, other organizations aim at improving the living conditions of the community and treat this as their core value.

Based on performance planning, organizations are required to subject their employees to regular training, skill update and regular control. Still under performance planning, employees must be well aware of any changes made within the system in order to remain relevant to the proposed operation system. This aspect is best described under performance accountability and value based operations. On the contrary, some health organizations tend to ignore some of the communications requirements between managers and employees and this limits advancement through changes. Similarly, changes in governance should have an elaborate discussion and implementation an according to the stipulated regulations (Edwards, 2010, p. 6). However, as much as some health organization strives to adjust their key appointments and incorporating the US jurisdictional requirements, other health organization politicizes appoints to key positions. In this case, the vision to have proper and participatory leaderships is never achieved.

Conclusion

Following the urge to make improvements in some of the healthcare services offered within various organizations, the decision making process follows considerable levels of high skills, professionalism and tolerance since the effect of such decisions correlates with the kind of feedbacks clients give concerning every service offered. Even though each healthcare organization and its stakeholders operate under unique objectives as governed by the organization’s vision, sustainability and efficiency in providing healthcare services offer equal operational platform with the general focus on improving the living standards and health status of clients.

References

Birk, Susan, (2010). The Evidenced- Based Road: Available Data Can Drive Successful Community Benefit Programs. Healthcare Executive. Press.

Edwards, Randy, (2010). Access: Reform Will Boost Health Care Coverage, But The Consequences Won’t Be Clearly As Cut And Dried As You Might Expect. Adrian Hillman: Coverage. Press.