Best Essay Service Paper on The Advantages and Disadvantages of Private Schools on Children

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Private Schools on Children


In the modern society, formal education has become part of the basic human needs. As a matter of fact, most governments across the globe, including those of third-world nations, have made it compulsory for children to acquire basic education. Both governments and parents are investing a better part of the revenue and income to ensure that the children have access to best possible education. Although in some cases public schools have been known to provide high quality education besides the numerous extracurricular activities, many parents are still convinced that private schools offer better education and are more advantageous in relation to what children draws from them (Berends, Springer, Ballou & Walberg, 2009, p. 71-73). Often, parents will go for private schools’ option, all in the endeavor to give their children the best of education. However, making an informed choice necessitates seeking as much information as possible on both systems of schooling.

Immense controversy has arisen over private schooling versus public schooling triggering much debate on the merits and demerits of each schooling system. However, the school system’s choice rests with the parents. Parents ought to review diverse traits of each type of school system prior to making a decision on whether to educate their children in private or public schools. In this regard, this paper seeks to examine both the pros and cons of private schools in relation to children. It is important to note that as much as the highlighted advantages and disadvantages of private schools tend to be general and apply to most such schools, it is difficult to generalize the findings because most of the pros and cons differ from one school to another.


Private schools/independent schools can be defined as schools that are funded or sponsored by non-governmental entities. They are thus, non-state or non-governmental and are not administered by national, local or state authorities. I f you mean USA please include that if not please Write in which country you mean by state???? They select their students according to their own internally defined systems and often acquire funds for running the institutions by charging tuition fee to the students as opposed to reliance on revenue from government. Although some of the private schools are for profit, thus the owners pay taxes to the government; others are not for profit and therefore are exempted from taxation.

Advantages of Private Schools

Quality of Education

            According to a study conducted by Ashley, Mcloughlin, Aslam, Engel et al. from the University of Birmingham on quality of education within private institutions, the quality surpasses that of public schools. The researchers observed that the ratio of teachers to learners is lower in such schools, which means that teachers are able to give greater attention to each student, consequently positively affecting their learning process (Ashley et al., 2014, p. 19-20). With lower ratios, the teacher is likely to note a student who is having a hard time grasping concepts and can give him/her extra attention, which is obviously advantageous to the learner. Moreover, when the number is smaller, other resources available for students are better shared. If such resources were scarce, students will not have such a hard time sharing compared to a situation where the ratio of resources-to-student is quite high.

            The quality of education is also likely to be better in private schools because the management is more committed to the success of the students, thus doing proper follow ups on teachers. Many private schools will employ extra effort to attract more students and thereby increase their profit margins. One of the most effective ways of realizing this objective is to ensure that their respective learning institutions produce the best candidates in local and national examinations (Ashley et al., 2014, p. 20-21). Private schools’ managements will go an extra mile to push the teachers so that they offer the learners the best education so that they can excel and attract more students to such schools. The management makes the learning environment most favorable for the students to perform extemporary well.

            In a study conducted by Perie, Baker, and Bobbitt (1997, p. 10), it was revealed that teachers in private schools spend time better than those of public schools. The researchers posited that time wastage within private institutions is lesser, which means that teachers spend more time in learning-related activities. Teachers in private schools tend to finish their respective syllabus earlier than in public schools and thus have more revision time. Because of the ample time they spend with the students, they are able to examine learners’ understanding of concepts and help the slow learners catch up with the rest of the students, which improves on the quality of education for such students.

Learning Goals         

            Almost every learner has a goal in life. Although some of the goals and desires and misguided and as a result of lack of exposure or lack of guidance, one will most likely work towards realizing that goal in life. Young people express the desires of what they would want to become upon clearing their education. Sometimes education systems can act as hindrances to realization of such goals because they may focus on things that are unrelated to the individual goals in life. Unlike public schools where the curriculum is set by the state or local authorities, requiring the schools to follow whatever directives and requirements are put in place, private schools have the liberty of creating their own curriculum and establishing their own customized systems of passing knowledge to learners (Phillipson, 2008, p. 70-71). This implies that private schools can create curriculums that fit the specific needs of the learners, which will eventually lead to the learners realizing their goals in life. The schools may also be able to impact necessary values and traits on students without necessarily having to follow government’s structures that may be unbeneficial to certain or all students. For example, private religious schools could include some specific religious teachings to be part of their curriculums and thus impact on students’ beliefs and values.

            The systems of examination/ evaluation established and prescribed by local and state authorities I f you mean USA please include that if not please Write in which country you mean????are sometimes ineffective because they fail to address the main goals of learning (Phillipson, 2008, p. 72). Such systems are used in both public and private schools but the advantage of private schools is that they can go an extra mile and examine the learning goals using other internal measures not prescribed by such authorities. For example, at present, most government-recommended evaluation systems “tend to focus on a limited number of lower-order, mechanistic learning objectives (e.g. spelling rather than expression)” (Phillipson, 2008, p. 73), which seldom assess critical learning goals for individuals or for subjects.

Innovativeness and Flexibility 

            There is higher level of innovativeness in private schools than in public learning institutions. The innovativeness majorly emanates from the higher degree of flexibility as well as greater accessibility to resources within such schools. In a study conducted by Pihie and Asimiran (2014, p. 4) across both public and private schools in Malaysia, it was observed that private schools teachers and management were able to exercise high level of flexibility, which encouraged creativity among both teachers and students. The teachers could try out new things because besides following the established curriculum they were allowed some degree of changes and alterations, which enabled them to try out whatever they thought as workable and more effective learning approaches. The teachers exhibited support towards their students on displaying their respective abilities and talents besides encouraging them to employ their acquired knowledge to enhance their knowledge acquisition. In the process, the students proved to be innovative and with the help of their teachers made great discoveries that proved helpful even in the life after school.

Better Long-term Effects

            According to the works of Nasir and Ali (1999, 937-938), private education has better long-term effects compared to public schools system of education. The two conducted a study across diverse private and public schools in Pakistan and noted that majority of public schools were not only overcrowded but they were also facing extensive shortage of resources. Majority of such schools were not able to achieve the universal goals of education, which related to fighting illiteracy and creating knowledgeable people who can contribute in social, economic, and political development of their respective nations. They observed that unlike in private schools, the students had inadequate teaching staff besides the shortage of other non-monitory incentives they required for learning. This was different for private schools where competition for students pushed the managements to have the best of resources and make the environment highly fertile for learning. As a result, the learners performed better in both academic and extracurricular activities. The students proved to be more competent and reliable in making decisions; they were more creative, and better equipped for the job market. This implied that private schools had better long-term effects on the students who would not struggle with their respective duties after school.

According to the data by the Centre for Education Policy Are they in USA or where, I need to know the country for this center???(CEP, 2007) on a comparison between private schools performance and performance of public schools, it was revealed that indeed with similar conditions, private school students tend to outshine their counterparts within public learning institutions. CEP heighted the findings of a longitudinal data conducted by the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) which compared private and public secondary schools’ performance by use of the data collected from 1988 through 2000. The data used (National Educational Longitudinal Study [NELS]), includes information on learners going beyond their achievements in high schools but as well as educational outcomes in and out of college, which involves educational attainment, job satisfaction and civic mindedness. The study by NAIS confirmed that average private student from private school outperformed an average public school student in all the measures. This study followed the students’ performance and other aspects of life after high school in an endeavor to obtain long-term outcomes (CEP, 2007, p. 6-7). However, the study had one shortcoming in that it did not account for the participant’s performance prior to their entry in high schools.

 Higher Discipline

            Private schools systems tend to impact on the morals of a student more than in public schools. Parents pay money for their sons and daughters to receive the best possible education and insist on being involved in the life of their (Phillipson, 2008, p. 70-71) children. In this way, parents can monitor their children’s morals and determine whether the school is offering them what they deem as morally-upright behaviors. In an endeavor to please the parents who are more or less like clients, the school administration employs extra effort to ensure that the students are disciplined and conduct themselves according to the laid-down behavioral standards. Often, such leads to more disciplined children compared to government-sponsored schools where the population is too high for teachers to monitor each student’s conduct and where the systems’ major focus is on academic content as opposed to creating an all-rounded leaner.  

Disadvantages of Private Schools

Social Cohesion

            One of the main disadvantages of private schools relates to shortcoming in social cohesion. Schools are supposed to provide a student with all rounded growth. However, most of the private learning institutions tend to emphasize on academic excellence at the expense of other aspects of life. Some of private schools do not even offer any extracurricular activities, and if any, they are just but a by-the-way but not an important aspect of learning or development. Therefore, the schools produces bright students who can only fit in activities related to education but not on other aspects of life. Social cohesion is not emphasized and such schools do not allocate time for students to engage in activities that would increase or help in their social development (Shuayb, 2012, p. 37-39). Although there are some private institutions that create such social times, majority of private schools tend to neglect this very import aspect of life, thus having long-term effects on the learners.

The place of social cohesion in the modern society cannot and must not be underrated. Socio-psychologists and Sociologists posit that most of the social problems evident in the modern society such as terrorism, extremism, and violence emanate from social disintegration. Lack of social cohesion is responsible for the escalations of social problems thus in learning institutions this aspect of life ought to be emphasized (Shuayb, 2012, 38). Besides, some jobs such as marketing, broadcasting, airhostess, nursing, and teaching among others require the professionals to be quite social and interactive, thus without this trait, individuals who schooled in private schools may turn out to be poor performers compared to those who learned how to be social right from their days in school.


            As observed earlier, many private schools are business ventures geared towards making an income for the owners. This implies that the owners may decide to increase on their profit margins by compromising on certain aspects of education. For example, local and state authorities have set minimum standards that persons have to meet in order to be employed as teachers within public schools. A degree in education or any other field may be indispensable for a high school teacher for public schools. However, in private institutions, the management determines who is qualified to be a teacher in different levels, thus sometimes they employ incompetent persons for teachers’ jobs (Durahm, n.d, p. n.p). This implies that the quality of education is highly compromised if a person lacks the necessary skills and expertise to be a teacher at a certain level. In an endeavor to increase their profits, private schools have been known to hire incompetent teachers who are paid lesser than professional teachers to fill in various positions, which leads to compromise on the quality of education offered to students.

            One of the most effective ways of improving the standard and the quality of education offered in learning institutions is through curriculum planning. Examining the situation in Philippines, the education deputy minister Dr. Felipe noted that better learning standards and better services go hand-in-hand in improving the curriculum planning and subsequently the quality of education offered. He noted that in Philippines, many private schools had failed to achieve this objective because the teachers were either half-baked or lacked any relevant qualification for the task of planning the curriculum, which leads to deterioration in performance. Drawing from a number of studies conducted across the country by his ministry, Dr. Felipe observed that private schools have a tendency of lowering the qualifications for teachers in an endeavor to have persons from whom they can extract cheap labor, consequently affecting the quality of education offered (Aquino, 1998, p. 63-64). These findings confirmed that teacher’s incompetence is likely to affect the quality of education within private schools, thus having negative impact on the students.  

Violation of Rights   

            As mentioned in the introduction, private schools are sponsored by non-governmental organizations. Often such organizations may comprise of religious groups such as mosques or churches, qualifying them as religious schools. I still need the reference for the highlighted sentence??? One of the main traits of such schools is that they tend to incorporate their respective religious beliefs and teachings into the curriculum or as part of the components of the school’s system. Although parents are well aware of this even as they enroll their children into such schools, sometimes this amounts to violation of the learner’s personal rights. I still need the reference for the highlighted sentence??? Learners come from diverse religious backgrounds or may not have any religious association. Some students may want to keep upholding their respective religious beliefs or non-beliefs but are forced by school’s systems to involuntarily practice or learn the school’s religious beliefs (Waggoner, 2013, p. 147-156). Although the students may not be compelled to recite things such as Pledge of Allegiance, which acknowledges God as the deity, failure to do so may lead to revealing of their non-religious views, thus amounting to violation of their freedoms.

            Besides violation of personal rights, imposing certain teachings on students is inconsistent with the need of multicultural education as emphasized by the government and various other stakeholders such as sociologists. For example, a Christian private school may teach the students about the Jewish background in an endeavor to lay the foundation about the Israelites’ education and subsequently the origin of Christianity, which may affect the students’ value of their respective religious backgrounds and hinder multicultural awareness. Some lessons such as holocaust among the Jews may trigger negative perception towards individuals who practice such religion and cause social disunity, which is unhealthy for any community. I still need the reference for the highlighted sentence??? According to an article on private religious schools by University of Michigan, it is socially unhealthy for learning institution to highlight on the weaknesses of other members of the society by pointing out their failures as often evident in religious teachings. Private religious schools do not have a tendency of providing a broad range of religious perspectives but presents religious information from a subjective stance.

Spoon feeding for Exams

            One of the outstanding disadvantages of private schools is their focus on exam results and fame than on the impact of the education on the students. Owing to the fact that private schools have the freedom to alter or customize the curriculum to fit their specific needs, they have a tendency of focusing more on the possible exams’ approach than on the content of education. Such schools will teach the students on how to approach exams and tackle different questions instead of focusing on what is more important than passing exams (Barr, 2012, p. 293-294). In the new Pdf you changed the author who stated this sentence, so I am confused. Is it this author or the last you wrote who is Janesick???   The author posited that unlike in many public schools where the teachers look for learners who will bring on board original or fresh contents in subjects, geared towards making the students educated and more informed, common traits within private schools is rushing towards the problems and how to solve them. I still need the reference for the highlighted sentence???Students do not focus on how to deal with complex challenges that calls for time in gathering thoughts and delivering structured responses.

Such kind of training has long-term effects on the students. At the university and post-graduate levels, students need to prove that they are not exams machines who are trained to repeat facts but are innovative and can be able to address real life issues as a result of the knowledge they drew from their various lessons in school. A person who is trained only to repeat facts may never become a competent performer in workplace where creativity is not only necessary but also part of career growth. Emphasis on content during teaching equips learners for quick and critical thinking and ability to respond to unfamiliar issues. I still need the reference for the highlighted sentence???


            Education role within modern society cannot be underestimated. Many parents are doing their best to provide their children with the best possible education in the hope of making their future more promising. The emergence of private school systems has received controversial responses from both its supporters and opponents. Parents often have a hard time in making decision on whether to enroll their children in private or public schools. This paper sought to highlight the pros as well as the cons of private schools in relation to the impact on the learners.

Private schools have a number of advantages associated to it as far as the impact upon the students is concerned. Several studies have proven that they tend to provide better quality education than public schools because of the low teacher-to-student ratio. Students are also accorded more attention and the teacher is able to help the slow learners keep up with the rest of the class. The teachers also spend more time with the students, which positively affect the students’ performance. Private schools have the freedom of altering the curriculum to fit the specific needs of the students, thus the learning goals tend to be addressed in such a system than in the state-sponsored learning institutions. The kind of teaching offered in private schools tends to have more long-term effects on the learners compared to public school’s teaching system. Some studies also observed that discipline level is higher in private schools than in public schools, thus having a better impact on the learners. Private schools also have a number of disadvantages associated with them including lack of social cohesion as teachers focus on academics, teachers’ incompetence as a result of hiring unqualified personnel, violation of personal freedoms such as in religious private schools and spoon feeding the students making them exam machines and missing out on the most important aspect of learning.



Aquin, R. (1998). Curriculum Planning for Better School Revised Ed. Quezon City:Rex Bookstore, Inc.

Ashley, L., Mcloughlin, C., Aslam, M., Engel, J., Wales, J., Rawal, S., Batley, R., Kingdon, G., Nicolai, S., & Rose, P. (2014). The role and impact of private schools in developing countries: a rigorous review of the evidence. Final report. Education Rigorous Literature Review. Department for International Development.

Berends, M., Springer, M., Ballou, D., & Walberg, J. (2009). Handbook of Research on School Choice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Center for Education Policy (CEP). (2007). Are Private High Schools Better Academically Than Public High Schools? Retrieved from

 Durahm, C. (n.d). Private Schools Vs Public Schools. Washington D.C: Clinton Gilkie.

Nasir, Z., & Ali, Z. (1999). Do Private Schools Produce More Productive Workers? The Pakistan Development Review, 38(4), pp. 937-954.

Perie, M., Baker, D., & Bobbitt, S. (1997). Time Spent Teaching Core Academic Subjects in Elementary Schools: Comparisons Across Community, School, Teacher, and Student Characteristics. London: DIANE Publishing.

Phillipson, B. (2008). Low-cost Private Education: Impacts on Achieving Universal Primary Education. it is a book, Right!!! So I need the Publisher for the book???

Pihie, Z., & Asimiran, S.I need the  year?  Entrepreneurial leadership practices and school innovativeness. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), pp. 1-11.

Shuayb, M. (2012). Rethinking Education for Social Cohesion: International Case Studies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Waggoner, M. (2013). Religion in the Public Schools:Negotiating the New Commons. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.