Assignment Writing Help on Nature VS Nurture Proponent

Nature vs. nurture proponent of nurture

                  In the issue of nature VS nurture debate, the fast growing understanding of the human genome has proven that both nature and nurture are partly right. Nature gives people the inborn abilities and traits and nature use this genetic tendency and molds them as people learn and grow to become adults (Ridley, 2004). Despite this stand, the debate on nature and nurture will still rage on since it is sometimes hard to determine how much of who people are shaped by the genes and how much by the environment.

                    The nature theory contends that the abstracts traits, for example, intelligence, personality and aggression are encoded in people’s DNA, for example, debates concerning the “gay gene” which suggests that there is a genetic component to sexual orientation continue to create more debate in the society today. If genetics don’t have a part to play, then the fraternal twins who are exposed to the same conditions would look then same despite the difference they may have in their genes. While numerous studies show that the twins resemble one another than children who are not twins, they also indicate the same similarities when the twins are reared apart.

                        The nurture theory does not discount the existences of the genetic tendencies, the supporters of this believe they just don’t exist, they contend that people behavioral aspects derives from environmental factors (Keller, 2010). The studies carried out on infant and child temperament presents evidence for this belief. Taking on the case of the twins, it can be argued that if the environment did not have a part to play in determining their traits and behavior, then the identical twins should be the same in all aspects. Numerous studies show that they are not the same (Rutter, 2002).

                  After looking at all this, the biggest question is, was the way people behave wired in them before they were born? Has it developed over time in response to the experiences that people come across? The conclusion of this matter is that, the link between genes and behavior is not similar to cause and effect. While genes may increase the probability of a person to behave in a certain way, they are not absolute explanations of why people do certain things, this means that people can chose what they want to be when they grow up.

Reference

Keller, E. F. (2010). The Mirage of Space Between Nature and Nurture. New York: Duke University Press.

Ridley, M. (2004). The Agile Gene:How Nature Turns on Nurture. New York: Harper Perrenial .

Rutter, M. (2002). The interplay of nature, nurture, and developmental influences: the challenge ahead for mental health. Archives of General Psychiatry, 996-1000.